When I read the article that Southern CONgress critters are pushing to eliminate birthright citizenship, I experienced a Yee-haw of joy, thinking, “It’s about time!”. A brief search of news items on the topic show that both Mike Huckabee , Ron Paul and Mitt Romney have each suggested eliminating birthright citizenship. The topic was also brought to the media’s attention in 2005. Given its emergence this close to a presidential election, the suggestion of such a move may be an election strategy. It would be nice to begin undoing the damage inflicted on this land by the 14th amendment.

That amendment has been the source of grievous issues and trouble for the South. A brief history of how the 14th amendment was interpreted into ‘birthright citizenship’ is given here. The 14th amendment has been the basis for abortion, the elimination of many States Rights, affirmative action and the invasion of this land via uncontrolled illegal immigration. This amendment has caused the loss of more life and more money than the nation has lost in all the wars combined. It has placed a financial burden on all of the empire’s legal subjects and been used to allow evils unleashed across the land. It would not be going to far to say that this amendment has been used for evil satanic purposes far beyond what the atheistic authors of the amendment intended.

It boggles the mind to think that in the Roe v. Wade ruling, the amendment was interpreted to mean that we have a ‘right’ to privacy. Where is that “right” now that the Patriot Act has been implemented? It seems that the supposed ‘right’ to privacy only existed at the time the case was argued. This kind of smoke and mirrors courtroom chicanery has stolen more freedoms from the citizens than foreign armies ever have. The 14th amendment does not mention the items that it has been used to justify. One thing it does outlaw is the freedom to question the validity of the debt it incurred in oppressing the south. The mere inclusion of such a statement is nothing more that a way to stop debate on the topic of the legitimacy of the debt along with the authority of the CONgress during that time. The legal thinking is that if the debt is seen as valid, then the authority of the agency behind the debt (i. e. CONgress) is likewise legitimate. Legally, the CONgress of the United States ceased to exist when the Southern representative left. It ceased to be a valid legitimate agency of the government at that time. By stopping the debate on the debt, they secured the appearance of legitimacy. Their ploy makes it unconstitutional to even question them, since at the time of approval, they were above the law. The Constitution now protected them and their illicit acts from legal challenges.

In the 14th amendment, the CONgress also violated the 10th amendment of the Constitution by stripping the States of much of their power. They also broke the constitution by their passage of section 3, which is an ex post facto law. Although the Constitution forbids those kind of laws from being passed, they did so with this amendment. The whole process was illegal and the legal theory used was inconsistent. The CONgressmen broke the law and used the 14th amendment to protect themselves from wrongdoing. It was a shameful act, with a shameful history.

The 14th amendment is law only because they say it is. It was not passed in a lawful manner. It is not a legitimate law. It is law only because the government uses force to make it so.

Free the South!

J Murrah

14th amendment, birthright citizenship, Economic Independence, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Political Well Being, Ron Paul

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!