Archive for May, 2010

The Struggle for Memory

THE STRUGGLE FOR MEMORY

Excerpts from Remarks Celebrating Confederate Memorial Day

Old Warrenton Cemetery Confederate Gravesite

Sponsored by Black Horse Camp #780

Sons of Confederate Veterans

May 30, 2010

by Thomas Moore

The hallmark of a healthy, vibrant People is their stories, traditions, folklore, tales, and legends, both the true and the mythic. In rich, viable cultures, it’s not just the rulers or politicians or captains of industry who are celebrated, but also the historians, the bards, the storytellers. These individuals are the repository of the collective memory of a People. Without it they have no identity. And with no identity, with no “individuation” as a worthy and distinct People, their society has no sense of purpose or direction. A People with no knowledge of their history, with no collective memory, have literally become senile. Collectively, they are just as dysfunctional as an individual with acute Alzheimer’s disease.

I believe we Southerners are a distinct People, with our own particular folkways, traditions, customs, music, speech, and a common history lived out in a shared space. In essence, we are an authentic nation. In fact, I believe we are the last authentic Western civilization in the historic sense of the word “civilization,” especially in contrast to today’s America, with its militant secularism, tawdry commercialism, and infantile celebrity worship that pass for civilization. One thing that distinguishes us in today’s America is that we Southerners understand the truth that we are what we remember. We are a people rich in memory.

You can see this in our continued reverence for our heroes – especially the distinguished Southerners who were the main figures in founding America as a great constitutional republic, a confederated union of sovereign states, as created by the Founders in 1787. And we honor equally those who fought to keep it so from 1861 to 1865. They sacrificed much to prevent it from degenerating into a unitary state, a virtually unlimited, authoritarian, centralized national polity, which is what the USA is today, thanks to the Northern victory in 1865.

For many decades after the War ended, the Southern people followed the admonition of General Lee and other Confederate leaders to obey the law and conduct themselves as loyal Americans. When Federal occupation ended in 1877, the South found itself being accepted, slowly, grudgingly, because America’s expanding commercial and political ambitions needed our proven valor and military aptitude. And of course, our vast natural resources and our tax revenues.

In the 1890’s a kind of social truce emerged between North and South, sometimes called the “Grand Bargain.” Under this truce the North agreed to stop demonizing the South. They acknowledged the South had been sincere and honorable in The War, although misguided in trying to break up the Union. They agreed that the courage and dedication of the Southern armies were worthy of praise, even in a wrong cause. Confederate heroes like Lee and Stonewall Jackson were honored as American heroes. Southerners were allowed back in the fold as citizens, though never quite on an equal footing with the rest of Americans.

In exchange for being allowed to erect our Confederate monuments, fly our flags, display our revered symbols, and pay tribute to our heroes, the South conceded it was best for the Union not to have broken up. We became loyal, patriotic Americans, giving our full energies to building the country. We paid our taxes and sent our sons to fight America’s wars – and today even our daughters. We went along with the burgeoning American empire because that is what the powers decreed.

The South has kept this bargain many times over. No part of the country has been more loyal and more patriotic than the South. The Stars and Stripes fly more ubiquitously in the South than in any other region. In every war from 1865 to the present, Southern men have served bravely, representing a disproportionate share of the enlisted ranks and officer corps — and of the dead and wounded. Nearly half today’s casualties in Afghanistan are from the 14 Southern States.

But sadly, the Grand Bargain has been broken, even while we Southerners are expected to continue living up to it. As Dr. Clyde Wilson, one of the South’s most distinguished historians, has said, “Our Confederate heritage is being banished to a dark little corner of American life labeled ‘Slavery and Treason.’ The people who seek to destroy our heritage are not folks we can win over by presenting historical evidence and assuring them we are good, loyal Americans free of hate. They could not care less about truth or heritage. We are not in an argument over the interpretation of the past. Our very identity as Southerners — today and tomorrow, as well as yesterday — is at stake.”

And the people cited by Dr. Wilson are not just Liberal Democrats and the perfervid ranks of the radical Left. They include so-called conservative Republicans as well. I know from experience, up close and personal and from the inside: the Republican Establishment to which so many Southerners have given their loyalty secretly despises us as much as the Democrats. In fact, the more loyal we are, the more the GOP Insiders and Neo-Cons despise us.

Today our ruling elites and their media lapdogs equate this Flag with the Nazi swastika, and the men who fought under it with Hitler’s legions. General Lee, a leading voice after the War for racial as well as political reconciliation, is dismissed with contempt as leader of an army of slave-drivers

Need I remind anyone here what happened when Governor Bob McDonnell recently tried to revive Virginia’s time-honored practice of honoring her Confederate history? The might of the establishment fell on him in full fury. The clamoring voices of moral sanctimoniousness insisted the Confederacy could only be cited if it was characterized as an exercise in treason, and that its soldiers fought only to enslave others. The Governor of course back-pedaled. He tried to apologize. He clearly hadn’t yet learned that you can never apologize enough or abase yourself abjectly enough before the altar of Political Correctness. I guess he knows it now.

The latest assault of the Marxist attempt to re-write history is by Roland Martin of CNN. In an April broadcast he attacked Governor McDonnell’s Confederate History proclamation, claiming — his words – that “celebrating the Confederates is akin to honoring Nazi soldiers for killing of Jews during the Holocaust,” and that Confederate soldiers should be considered “domestic terrorists.”

Do you feel insulted, or worse, assaulted? If not, you should. This is a gross insult – to you and to me and to the truth. But it’s more than an insult, as bad as that is. It’s more than a malicious lie borne of Political Correctness.

This kind of expunging of memory has profound and troubling political implications. Such acts have been the trademark of totalitarian regimes throughout the ages. The Communist dictator Stalin understood this principle. He said, “Who controls the past controls the present.” If despots can make you believe a false story about the past, they can control and manipulate your actions in the present for their selfish purposes. If they can label you as an enemy of the state, then you’re fair game and defenseless.

Stalin went to extraordinary lengths to expunge the names and images of his one-time colleagues and later rivals like Kirov and Trotsky from the pages of books and newspapers. Hitler had the ancestral village of his natural grandfather razed and tried to eliminate its very memory (from a fear the man was Jewish). The Jacobins of the French Terror, Mao Tse-Dong and the Red Chinese, and the Khmer Rouge all engaged in this most common behaviour of despots: warring against history and erasing memory. It recalls to us the words of Czech writer Milan Kundera: “The struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting.”

These are the ominous parallels with the campaign against Southern history and identity. This attempt to expunge memory and re-write history is a form of aggression. It’s a key strategy in the “cold civil war” raging in our country. It’s part of a new political paradigm that supersedes the old Left-Right paradigm. It supersedes the false dichotomy of Republicans versus Democrats, who are really just two wings of the same bird of prey, simply two gangs fighting over the spoils.

The real conflict today is between those who still cling to an older tradition of human dignity and liberty versus those who seek to control, exploit, and plunder their fellow man. It’s between those who still worship and serve God and those who worship and serve the state.
The relentless campaign of hatred, vilification, and elimination of all things distinctly Southern from the public sphere is not an inconsequential matter. It tells us our culture is marked for extinction. And why do the power elites want to destroy it?

Because the old Jeffersonian idea of personal responsibility, individual liberty, and limited government is the Southern political ideal. And that ideal is precisely the target. To eliminate it, Southern history and memory which have nurtured it, must be destroyed. And if the culture which shelters these ancient ideals is destroyed, then the liberty which sprouted and flourished in its soil, the personal freedoms which it sustains, will not be far behind.
Seen in this light, the cause of the South and the preservation of its memory, its traditions, and its symbols is the cause of decent men and women everywhere who love liberty and seek to live in dignity.

###

Thomas Moore is Chairman of the Southern National Congress.

PS. Remember the Roland Martin is Texas born, and a graduate of Texas A&M, whose graduates are supposed to be people of integrity, honor and honest. Equating the Confederacy with domestic terrorism is not honorable, honest or integrity in the spirit of Sul Ross and the college he led.

Technorati , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

History of Confederate Memorial Day

With the ‘official’ Yankee Memorial Day upon us, I thought I would search for accounts of why there is a Confederate Memorial Day. Although I shouldn’t be surprised, there are few pages on the internet that convey why the Confederate Memorial Day is separate from the Yankee one, even on some Southron pages. Bear in mind that in the years after the war, the Union forbid Southerners from decorating the graves of Confederate soldiers buried in Arlington. This fact is often omitted from many of the accounts regarding the holiday. Southron wives, sons and daughters wanted to honor the fallen, but were prevented from doing so, hence they began Confederate Memorial Day. Although the accounts have been rewritten to claim that Memorial Day was a time to decorate the graves of both sides, the historic accounts do not support that myth. In the days after the war, efforts were put forth to meld us all into “Americans” rather than being Texans, Tennesseans, South Carolinans or Viriginians. The effort to do so has been effective. In order to insure that such a reconstruction takes, they have to rewrite the history in order to support their assertions.

This Southron (Texian) remembers. He knows the origins and has not bought into the myths and lies about memorial day. He knows that the South acknowledged “Almighty God” as the source of its strength in their Constitution, whereas the Yankees did not. (Perhaps if they did, they would realize they will have to answer to Him for their actions).

Some historians claim that Confederate Memorial Day was about holding onto the last remains of Southern society and racism. Such a claim is bogus and they know it. The facts show that 20% of the Confederate Navy was black. There were also significant numbers of other minorities serving in Confederate forces. The effort to erase their efforts is an affront to the truth. Once again, history is being rewritten in order to support some new myths.

Confederate Memorial Day began out of the Yankees not allowing us to honor our dead. We still remember our dead, but many have forgotten the story behind the day.

Let us also not forget that Arlington was stolen from the Robert E. Lee family. The Yankees intentionally dug graves on the Lee property as an effrontery to his wife. It was originally began as Yankee spite on stolen ground. Although honorable men may lie there, its origins are less than honorable. A spiteful act upon stolen land. Let us not forget the actual events and be distracted by the pomp and pageantry of Arlington National Cemetery. Obama was right in placing a wreath there last year, since it was stolen from Southrons.

Let us bring to remembrance the deeds of our fathers and honor them.

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Votes

Well, the vote is in on the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Here is how out Texas CONgress critters voted on this matter. Aye means they support ending the policy, a “no” vote means they want to keep it.

Texas
No TX-1 Gohmert, Louis [R]
No TX-2 Poe, Ted [R]
No TX-3 Johnson, Samuel [R]
No TX-4 Hall, Ralph [R]
No TX-5 Hensarling, Jeb [R]
No TX-6 Barton, Joe [R]
No TX-7 Culberson, John [R]
No TX-8 Brady, Kevin [R]
Aye TX-9 Green, Al [D]
No TX-10 McCaul, Michael [R]
No TX-11 Conaway, K. [R]
No TX-12 Granger, Kay [R]
No TX-13 Thornberry, William [R]
Aye TX-14 Paul, Ronald [R]
Aye TX-15 Hinojosa, Rubén [D]
Aye TX-16 Reyes, Silvestre [D]

No TX-17 Edwards, Thomas [D]
Aye TX-18 Jackson-Lee, Sheila [D]
No TX-19 Neugebauer, Randy [R]
Aye TX-20 Gonzalez, Charles [D]
No TX-21 Smith, Lamar [R]
No TX-22 Olson, Pete [R]
Aye TX-23 Rodriguez, Ciro [D]
No TX-24 Marchant, Kenny [R]
Aye TX-25 Doggett, Lloyd [D]
No TX-26 Burgess, Michael [R]
No TX-27 Ortiz, Solomon [D]
Aye TX-28 Cuellar, Henry [D]
No TX-29 Green, Raymond [D]
Aye TX-30 Johnson, Eddie [D]
No TX-31 Carter, John [R]
No TX-32 Sessions, Peter [R]

The liberal democrats voted in favor of doing away with the policy which opens the door to problems in the military. The same old bunch of Shiela Jackson Lee, AL Green, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Lloyd Doggett, Henry Cuellar, Ciro Rodriguez, Reuben Hinojosa, and Silvestre Reyes and Charlie Gonzales once again sold out the values of Texans. As we approach election time, REMEMBER how they voted. Don’t let all the rhetoric confuse you. Look at what they did, not what they say.

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Regime makes accusations of treason?

A recent report from Russian sources claim that the regime has threatened 14 governors on charges of treason. The report claims that the governors received National security Letters (NSL’s). NSL’s are a tool used by the empire in enforcing their ways. A NSL amounts to a subpoena used in either collecting data or enforcing matters by edict. The NSL is another provision of the Patriot Act. The rub with a NSL is that under law, one cannot mention whether they have received one. In other words it is illegal to tell anyone that you have received a NSL (how quaint). So IF the governors of 14 States have received them, they could not discuss them or mention them, otherwise they would be breaking the law. It the report is true, then the Governors of those States are in a catch-22.

Whether or not the report is credible, it is worth noting that the States mentioned are Minnesota, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. (Do you see a pattern in these States?). The report claims that the Governors of the Southern states still have control of State guard units, which is a burr under the saddle of the regime. Perhaps these Southron States know something that the other Governors have forgotten.

The fact that the report cites Texas v White and addresses the Southron issues does say that the South poses a threat to the regime.

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Border non-protection redux

I find it awfully ironic that one of the issues that led to Texas seceding from the Union was that they did not protect the borders as they had promised. Now, 150 years later, they still do not protect the border and the current regime has gone so far as to single out Texas for non-enforcement of the border. Governor Perry has requested national guard troops for the border, and the head of the regime has refused to address the matter. Ironically, the President of Mexico has stipulated that any national guard troops stationed NOT to enforce immigration matters. During such times, it make one wonder “Who is calling the shots here?”

The empire is wanting more money from the citizens, but providing fewer services, taking us deeper in debt, and not protecting the citizens.

Have you had enough yet?

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Brussels: The center of the free world?

Vice-head of the regime Joe Biden often speak out without thinking about what he is saying. In a recent slip, he identified Brussels, Belgium as the potential capitol of the free world. Perhaps he was trying to buddy up to the Europeans, or perhaps he let slip the location of his handlers. Either way, it reveals the mindset of the regime and it is not focused on expanding our liberties.

Brussels is the headquarters of the EU. It is far from conservative. The nation itself, if you follow the events there through the Brussels Journal, is falling apart. It is a nation which faces the possible secession of Flanders. If this is the center of the free world, we do have problems. Biden’s comment do help explain why the break away group Vlaams Belang was shunned by the regime when it took the reins of power. It explains why the group was not invited to watch the sham swearing in at the embassy located in Brussels. The Vlaams Belang see the danger of Sharia law, and how it could destroy culture and civilization.

The talk of Brussels sends several signals. 1) The regime is out of touch with the people 2) The regime wants to create an EU type structure and is enamored by it.

Rather than kissing up to the EU, they need to be protecting our own borders. But, this administration is doing the opposite of George Washington’s advice of “Avoid entangling alliances” avoid European affairs. Instead, they are headed straight into it. The Obama regime is antithetical to that of George Washington. The regime is pushing policy that is antithetical to freedom and liberty, replacing it with Euro-style socialism and bureaucracy.

The Belgium connection will be worth following to see what unfolds.

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah
Brussels: The center of the free world?

Technorati , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

By their fruits ye shall know them…

If it wasn’t bad enough having to keep up with all the latest escapades of the empire, know we have to deal with the fruit of their shabby immigration policies. Somali terrorists are rumored to be in Texas, and more specifically, the Houston area. Now our families lives are endangered by a regime that kowtows to other nations, and is reluctant to take strong stands on immigration issues. We all have to be at risk due to their policies (or choice to not enforce policies). It was bad enough that we had terroristic threats in Arlington (but the press dismissed the actions of a trained sniper with explosives in that case). Now we have Somali terrorists in our midst that were smuggled into the empire from…Mexico. (Anyone surprised?)

We need a Southern nation that protects its borders, and its people. We need a republic that minds its own business. We need a republic that does not tax the people to death, rather than an empire that tells people and other nations how to live. That advocates reconstruction of society, using the government to accomplish that agenda.

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Borders? Who needs borders?

The regime openly stated to the President of Mexico, that “We are defined not by our borders, but by our bonds…”. What does he mean by that? Obama disregards the borders as a definitive extent of the nation. Is he telling Mexico to come in, or sending a signal to Mexico, that he is about to take them over? He knows about the importance of borders, since he often pressures Israel to respect borders. Sadly, Obama respects the borders of Palestine and takes a firmer stand on them than he does on the nation he leads.

“defined…by our bonds”. On the surface, he is addressing the connectedness of the US and Mexico. Since he is not from Texas, he does not recall the ethnic cleansing done by Mexican troops in 1812 and again in 1836. Nor does he realize the many raids into Texas by Mexico where atrocities were committed over the years. He forgets that Mexico did not honor the Treaties signed by Santa Anna (Treaty of Velasco). Since he is not talking about connectedness, perhaps he is referring to the many bonds the US has sold to China and other nations. Since those nations have the national debt, they own us and define the nation and its policies. Perhaps that is what he means in being defined by obligatory bonds. He may have signed them, but I did not.

The empire is in shambles and the head of the regime speaks in half-truths and confused mixed messages. He does not want Arizona to check citizenship status, yet requires the students at Kalamazoo High School to do so. (Hmmm….double standard or just wanting to deny a State to exercise power that he thinks only belongs to him).

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Remember where you came from

If you are a citizen living in Gaonzales, Fayette, Austin, Burleson, or DeWitt Counties, you need to be concerned with the State Board of Education Election. One of the candidates for District #10, which includes your counties is Dr. Judy Jennings She has a doctorate in Educational Psychology, lives in Austin-nuff said!). She is a BIG supporter of the Thomas Jefferson Movement, which seeks the removal of conservative values from textbooks. By hiding behind Thomas Jefferson, they hide the real agenda. If Dr. Jennings and the other members of the Thomas Jefferson Movement were honest and open about their agenda, the picture would be different. By focusing on an abridged version of Jefferson, they draw attention away from their real agenda. Bear in mind that Jefferson has NOT been removed, rather his role as a founding father has been emphasized rather than this ’separation of church and state’ position which liberals love. I doubt that the liberals embrace Jefferson’s love of guns, small national government, low taxes, and strong state government.

Let us consider what was changed. The new changes present the impact of President Johnson’s “Great Society” programs both positive and negative.

How government programs have destroyed traditional family structures in some communities.

How affirmative action has created problems.

How the US interned Japanese, German and Italians during world war II

How the Black Panthers and Marcus Garvey impacted civil rights

Effects of illegal immigration

Importance of Free Enterprise

and others

I encourage you to see for yourself what changes were proposed. Rather than join the masses clamoring about Thomas Jefferson, find out for yourself. It will be up to you voters to decide whether you want your children to remember the Alamo as a stand taken by imperialist slave holders who wanted to steal Texas from Mexico as advocated by the mother of San Antonio’s mayor or if the Alamo was a response by freemen, legal citizens of Mexico and immigrants rising to stand against the cultural cleansing and tyrannical policies of an murdering dictator. The decision is yours. The counties that will be deciding have a long history of freedom. Remember where you came from when it comes time to vote.

Do you want a history that praises big government, ridicules Christian influences and praises socialists and socialism or do you want truth and freedom to think. The choice is yours. Who do you trust with your child’s education?

Liberty for Texas and the South!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

A Duty to be Oppressed?

A Duty to be Oppressed?

by Larkin Rose

Do good, upstanding citizens have a moral obligation to allow themselves to be oppressed, harassed, terrorized, assaulted, and wrongfully detained or imprisoned? Most people would say “no.” But would most people actually mean it?
There are many examples of “law enforcers” treating innocent people like dirt. Random stops at “sobriety checkpoints” is a favorite of mine, since the local jackboots do that in front of my house on occasion. (In fact, they’re doing it right now, as I write this.) The border Gestapo is even worse. And a YouTube search for “police abuse” will provide you with hours of infuriating examples of fascist pigs in action.

So, do we have an obligation to put up with being treated like that? Think carefully before you answer. Because an answer of “no, we don’t,” implies that we have a right to resist it, to not cooperate. And, of course, the control freaks and megalomaniacs with the badges aren’t going to react kindly to anyone disobeying their gang. They will always escalate things to violence until they get their way.

If, for example, you believe that you have a right to not be searched without cause, a right not to be interrogated for no reason, and a right not to be detained for no reason, then logically you must also believe that you have the right to drive right through a “sobriety checkpoint” without stopping. And what if they try to forcibly stop you–as they certainly would–for exercising your rights? Do you then have an obligation to be oppressed? Or do you have the right to respond with force against force, in whatever degree it takes to overcome their attempts to detain you without just cause?

This is the horrible choice tyrants force everyone to make, on a regular basis: you either submit to their will, or you react with violence. And, unlike the badge-wearing crooks who call themselves “law enforcers,” the good people don’t like to use violence. So they almost always allow themselves to be oppressed. And that tells the tyrants that they can increase the injustice even more. The end result is … well, Frederick Douglass summed it up quite well:

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they have resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress.”

Let me put the point even more bluntly: Every time oppression increases, the people have only two choices: unconditionally submit, or kill the oppressors. These are the only choices, because the oppressors themselves don’t allow for any option in between. (There is sometimes a temporary third choice: running away and hiding. But not only is living on the run a form of oppression in itself, but sooner or later, when the control freaks find you, you will have to either submit or resist.)

Even if you “passively resist,” or “resist” with mere words, you are submitting to the tyranny, by letting them lock you up and punish you for your disobedience. (To say that the moral thing to do is to allow yourself to be oppressed, and then complain afterwards, still implies that you have an obligation to be oppressed.) On the other hand, the moment you actually resist–the moment you refuse to allow them to oppress you–you will plainly see the violence inherent in all “government” action.

And, of course, when oppression is “legal”–as it usually is–if you resist it, you become (by definition) a “criminal,” and probably a “terrorist” as well. Of course, the violence, harassment, intimidation, threats, assault and outright murder committed in the name of “government” aren’t usually called “terrorism” (though that’s exactly what they are) but resisting such oppression is.

In short, “government” makes terrorists. Whether you’re talking about international thuggery or domestic oppression, it is nearly always authoritarian violence which drives people to resort to the violent reactions which are dubbed “terrorism.” Of course, that doesn’t mean such reactions are always justified (and they are never justified when they target innocents), but it does mean that, in almost every case, “terrorism” is a product of “government.” An authoritarian regime traps people, controls them, and backs them into a corner, where they see violence as their only option. Whether their cause is righteous or not, or their means justified or not–whether you’re talking about the American Revolution, or some suicide bomber in the Middle East–the pattern is the same. People are driven to the point where a perceived injustice is so great that they feel they must resort to violence.

With that in mind, ask yourself, what would your local “law enforcers” have to do before you would resist by force (thereby making yourself a “criminal” and/or a “terrorist”)? Try to take your guns away? Try to take your children? Try to arrest you for criticizing “government”? In other words, what level of oppression will you actually not tolerate. Because so far, you’ve tolerated pretty damn much. Yes, lots of people whine, complain, and criticize, but until you actually resist, you are, by definition, tolerating the injustice, by allowing it to happen (to you and others).

Of course, I “tolerate” it, too, as demonstrated by the fact that I’m not dead, and not a fugitive. I’m not advocating martyrdom here. But it’s about time for Americans to start thinking about things they’ve been trained to not think about. The bogus tripe about “land of the free and home of the brave” is sounding pretty lame these days, when you look at what Americans quietly submit to on a regular basis. Of course, it’s not up to me to tell you at what point you should resist. But you ought to start thinking about it. Because somewhere between where we are now, and complete totalitarianism–and that gap is shrinking all the time–you will have to decide between being a slave, and being a “terrorist.”

——————————————————————————–

This article first appeared on www.freedomsphoenix.com , on May 14, 2010. Republished by permission. For more excellent commentary, visit Larken Roses’s blog at www.larkenrose.com

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!



http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping