Archive for the 'Culture' Category

The Biggest Devils in Fort Worth

In the 1920’s, when the Ft. Worth pastor J. Frank Norris spoke out, people listened. He was not ashamed of his Christian faith or his Southern roots. He was also not intimidated by those who opposed him. His courage inspired many in his generation to take stands on the issues of his day. He spoke out from the pulpit on the issues of his day. He named names and took stands, including announcing who owned the houses of prostitution in the city. He was particularly known for his Sunday night preaching, where he delivered sermons such as “The Ten Biggest Devils in Ft. Worth–Names Included.”

His preaching turned the city of Fort Worth and the South around. There were also strong reactions as fires were set at his home and church. Those events did not slow him down, and he continued in his work.

When I read about Norris, I often wonder what he would say about the first lady putting in an appearance in his beloved Fort Worth. She will be there launching a new meddling program at one of the olive garden restaurants, as she tries telling people what to eat. She will also be doing this on our taxpayer monies.

This is a woman who cavorts with abortionists, unveils federal rules and programs she was behind, (bear in mind that SHE was not elected to office; She is not to make policy) , and keeps her voodoo practicing mother in the White House.

In Norris’ day, a woman who spent millions of taxpayer dollars on vacations, enacted illegal legislation, pushed her husband to promote illegal legislation (Obamacare), keeping a voodoo practicing mother around, and cavorting with abortionist killers would not be seen in a good light. What was wickedness in one generation is now promoted by the press and politicians as ‘acceptable”. I suspect that if Norris was still around, he would have to expand his list of devils in Fort Worth.

We need men and leaders like Norris, who were not afraid to speak out on the issues of their day. Norris took stands for his family, his beliefs and culture. In the past three years, we have seen the government take over healthcare, financial institutions and the automobile giants. They are now in the process of taking over food production and other areas of our lives.

We need to remember men like J Frank Norris who took firm stands. We often extol Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Stonewall Jackson and others of their generation. We need to remember that every generation has its devils that hate Southern culture and values. We need to remember those who stand up in their generations in the struggle which we are a part of.

Instead of fawning over the dresses and galas attended by such public persons, we need to examine their values. We need to consider what they are promoting. If it is opposed to Southern values, it is not in our best interest. Unconstitutional laws such as Obamacare, unconstitutional policies (like her lunch programs), cavorting with murderers, and welcoming voodoo practitioners are not in keeping with Southern values. Spending millions of taxpayer dollars on trips is not in keeping with Southern values either. Instead of welcoming such persons to Texas, we need to take a page from the J Frank Norris book and speak out against it.

Liberty for Texas!

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Lessons from our Past

When Joseph D. Sayers served as Governor of Texas, the State went through its share of disasters. This former commander of the Val Verde Battery made it a point of not asking for federal aid when Texas went through the flood of 1899. In that flood, the Brazos River overflowed after there was a massive 17-inches of rain. The damage was extreme and severe. In responding to the flood, the cities and citizens of Texas took care of their own. This is a far cry from the mindset of today when the empire has thousands dependent on its funds. Even when disasters strike, the call often quickly goes out for the feds to assist. That is not the way it has always been. It is only a recent phenomena. This is striking contrast to how the leader of the current regime (which has seen no military service) when speaking at the University of Michigan incited the students claiming that others needed to pay for their education. Not only should others pay for it, they should pay MORE for it. Those OTHERS include the people across the nation paying the bill for students attending the University of Michigan. It is not our responsibility to take care of Michigan’s education. It is not the responsibility of Texas to underwrite those promoting alien values and from other States above one’s own.

We need more leaders like Joseph Sayers who championed self-reliance rather than federal dependencies like the current regime does. Let us remember those who went before and stood for principle and taking care of Texas.

Liberty for Texas!

J Murrah

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

The Approaching referendum on Scottish Independence

A referendum on Scottish Independence is tentatively scheduled for 2014. Already debates are beginning over what is legal and not legal regarding the voting. The Scots are wanting those living overseas to have their votes counted. If such a referendum happened regarding Texas independence, I am sure that the DOJ (especially under the current regime) would attempt finding every excuse possible to delay or water down the election results.

Common sense dictates that free people should be allowed to vote on whether on not to have their freedom. The Scottish referendum gives us hope, that after those many years under the English yoke, they finally are allowed a vote. Let us hope that after the many years we have been under the Yankee yoke that we will be allowed such a referendum as well. When you can not vote and do not have a say, you are not truly free. For years I was told, “America is the freest nation on earth”. For many years I believed it, although when other nations are allowed to vote and declare their independence and we are not, such actions speak loudly. It is also disturbing when you realize that the vote to join the Union along with the vote approving the re-admission into the union were both rigged and illegal. In 1845, there were thousands of US troops on Texas soil. It was not a free vote. Toward the end of reconstruction, when another vote was taken, many of the former leaders were not allowed to vote. Sure, there were elections, but only those approved of by the military establishment were allowed to remain in office. It is not a legal election when voters have been illegally disenfranchised from voting. The Congress forced Texas to abide by Un-Constitutional policies they implemented as part of ‘military occupation’. That is not freedom, that is not a free vote.

Let us hope that the English overlords allow a fair and free election, and that someday well will have one too.

Liberty for Texas

J Murrah

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Removing federal troops from Texas

Jesse Jackson has opened his mouth about Texas. It seems that each time he opens his mouth, he spews forth more lies and hypocrisy. Although he may be read, he is not knowledgeable about Texas and its history. He likens voter ID to removing occupational troops from the south and focused on Texas. Bear in mind that Yankee occupation lasted longer in Texas than any other Sovereign State. Bear in mind that those occupational troops shot alligators for fun, burned down the Tremont Hotel in Galveston, destroyed half of Brenham, and killed numerous people in cold blood just for fun. In Gonzales, Texas they used the postal stage for target practice as it entered and left town.

In terms of decency we needed the federal troops removed much sooner to protect property and lives. More property and lives were lost with federal troops in Texas than without. We had 50,000 occupational troops compared to 5,000 Union troops before the war. The 1,000% increase was unnecessary and uncalled for. Since Jackson has made the comparison, we do not need to eliminate voter ID either. Voter ID is merely a way to reduce voter fraud. It hold people accountable. Texas has already seen voter fraud in many elections, including the controversy with Ciro Rodriguez, and Sheila Jackson Lee. With voter fraud already running rampant in campaigns involving demokrats, it only makes sense to take steps at reducing the possibility of fraud in the 2012 election, (although fraud is the only way the demok-rats will win).

Liberty for Texas and remember your history.

J Murrah

Technorati , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Effeciency in the federal government=danger to the people

The founding fathers intentionally made the federal level of government slow and inefficient. It was meant to be cumbersome and SLOW. It was intended to be awkward and limited. When the regime takes action to make it more efficient, it is a danger to the people. You may ask “How is that?”. It is a danger in that more efficient government and less red tape means that it is unrestrained in the exercise of its power.

In the latest installment of the empire expending its power by gaining efficiency, the current regime is attempting to consolidate more power. The only bright spot is that it is blaming Nixon for the current inefficiency. The mantra of the left back in the seventies was “Nixon is the One”, it seems that they still believe that. This is typical of the current demuplocian regime. Their favorite ploy is blaming others for messes rather than assume responsibility. This is a ploy of many “What’s in it for us?” who want a government big enough to provide for them rather than a government that protects the borders and functions within Constitutional limits. Remember that the bill of rights gave LIMITED power to the federal government and the rest was given to either the States or the People?

Instead of more efficient government, we need a government that obeys the Constitution. We need a government that operates withing the limits that were originally placed upon it. We need a government that obeys rather than circumvents the law.

The South has long stood for LIMITED government with LIMITED powers. Rather than a large central government with unlimited powers and centralized control which has been favored by liberals. Consider this, had the north stayed within its Constitutional limits, Lincoln would not have been able to fight his war. The Congress knows this. That is why they have operated “Sine die” since the war. They know that they have not been operating legitimately since 1861!

Liberty for Texas!

J Murrah

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

The Real Domestic Terrorists

The Real Domestic Terrorists
Dr. Michael Hill - LS President

Dr. Michael Hill - LS President Those who support States rights, constitutional government, and the right of secession are now commonly called by the ruling elite right-wing extremists and potential domestic terrorists. We traditional Southerners are indeed familiar with this game. Had the term been around then, our ancestors - from Washington and Jefferson to Lee and Davis - would have been called domestic terrorists by the Brits and Yankees, respectively. As it was, they were simply called “traitors.” We reject the use of both terms for ourselves and for our forebears. Instead, we can make a good case that the real threats to domestic peace and quiet are on the other side. And yet we continue to pay them tribute and allow them to rule over us.

Who They Are?

The real domestic terrorists were (and are) those who oppose ordered Christian liberty and the worldview which upholds it. Indeed, Abe Lincoln and his minions have sired a long line of domestic terrorists, including most recently George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama (and all who aid them in their misrule). We might throw the larger part of Congress into the mix as well.

Most of what the U.S. government does is beyond the bounds of its constitutional limitations. That makes it unlawful. That which is unlawful ultimately terrorizes society. Jefferson told us that the fundamental law of the land should be viewed as chains to bind a singularly dangerous beast (the general government). For a while the beast was successfully bound; however, he slipped his chains for good in 1865 and our republic of republics was lost. Today, we live under a strange combination of socialism and fascism that would surely please a Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, or Mao as much as it would disgust our Founders.

How we came to this point is fairly clear - there was a slow and steady revolution, and most Americans were asleep while it patiently worked its way through virtually every institution in the land. Some of our fellow subjects still don’t realize what has transpired. But they soon will.

Things were bad under Bush II. But because he and the GOP masqueraded as “conservatives,” most Americans thought all was well. But as a famous Alabamian once said, there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the two major political parties. And he was right. Bush I or Clinton; Bush II or Obama - the rhetoric may differ but the results are still the same: bigger, more intrusive, and lawless central government and less liberty and prosperity for the rest of us. Now, what little we have left in terms of liberty and property is being taken from us openly without any meaningful resistance on our part.

An Organized Criminal Enterprise

That the U.S. government is an organized criminal enterprise cannot be doubted by anyone who has kept abreast of the on-going, broad-open-daylight effort to loot the country’s wealth. The multiple trillion dollars’ worth of bailouts and related schemes have enriched even further the Money Men who pull the strings that animate the politicians, and the fleecing shows no sign of abatement. In case you’re wondering why this is being allowed to happen, remember this - your Congressmen and Senators don’t work for you; rather, they work for those who fill their campaign coffers and make election and re-election possible. They work for the Money Men, and the Money Men own “your” government lock, stock, and barrel. And they are about to own everything else . . . unless they are stopped.

Don’t expect an appeal to the Constitution or to common decency to stop the criminal class from further terrorizing the country. Of the latter, they have none. And to them, the former is but a mere scrap of parchment. In fact, wasn’t it George W. Bush who called it just a “G-d damned piece of paper?” Well, in a way he was right (but for the wrong reason, of course). The great Southern political philosopher John C. Calhoun also noted that the Constitution was but an inanimate object, incapable of enforcing itself. Rather, he said, it is up to the people, in their capacity as citizens of the several sovereign States, to make sure it is enforced. He also told us: “Only power can check power.”

So, in reality, we are in the mess we’re in because we have not done our job of keeping the singularly dangerous beast chained down. It has broken free and become our master and we its servants. In the process it has become exceedingly powerful as well. It holds us in the balance of life and death, or so it seems.

Mounting The Resistance

Any form of tyranny deserves a hard resistance. The current crop of domestic terrorists will not stop looting our wealth and our inheritance of liberty until we make them stop. It’s as simple as that. We Southerners ought to be the first to resist; such audacity is in our blood. But what can we do in the face of such irresistible power? First, we can psychologically withdraw our consent from the criminal class that rules over us. Our system is supposedly based on the “consent of the governed.” If you believe it still is, then withdraw your consent. Not even the hardest tyranny can exist without the support of the “drawers of water and hewers of wood” (to use an old Irish example). Once we withdraw our consent psychologically, then we can begin to withdraw it physically. Simply put, don’t work for them in any capacity and don’t give them anything you can keep out of their thieving hands. Don’t patronize their institutions. Don’t vote for anyone who runs in their pack. Remember, they are robbing you (and your posterity) blind under color of law without fear of reprisal. Make them earn what they steal from you.

I have been asked by some: “How do we resist this criminal element when we have no way of getting at them?” That’s a logical question. After all, who is going to march into the bowels of DC or Wall Street and arrest the President, the Fed Chairman, the Treasury Secretary, the CEO of Goldman Sachs, or even your garden-variety Congressman or Senator? They live and work like royalty in veritable fortresses constructed and guarded with the money they’ve looted from you, the peasants. They’re also protected by “the law” (which they get to make and interpret), and if you break it they’ll lock you away or shoot you. So how do you stop this criminal element? While you may not be able to exert any direct influence on the big fish, you certainly can make life very uncomfortable for the smaller fish - the enforcers who do their dirty work on the State and local levels.

History is full of examples of how occupied peoples socially ostracized their occupiers. If your community has enforcers of the present tyranny, make sure everyone knows who they are and what they’re up to. Isolate them and give no voluntary cooperation. Our rights to life, liberty, and property come from God and not from any government. Behave as if you believe this. If they tell you it is illegal to grow your own food to feed yourself and your neighbors, then grow your own food in spite of them. This restriction is not as farfetched as you might think. If they tell you to turn in your firearms, hide them away. If they show up at your door to collect them, resist. The law of self-protection is fundamental and Biblical. If they tell you it is forbidden to worship the true and living God, then do it openly in the public square. If they come to take your children, then behave like a cornered animal. Under no circumstances should you voluntarily give up your God-given rights to tyrants. They are used to a soft and acquiescing populace. Surprise them. Again, make them pay a high price for what they steal.

Resistance From The States

If you want to defend your community from the domestic terrorists, first use the proper constitutional vehicle - your State. This is where ultimate temporal sovereignty resides in our system. Of course, most (if not all) of our State governments are in the hands of men who seek the favor of the criminal class, are a part of it (or at lease aspire to be), or are scared to challenge it. But it is a much easier task to take control of your State government than it is to affect policy in Washington, DC. If your State has already passed a Sovereignty Resolution or is considering one, you have some hope. Talk with your elected State and local officials about strengthening your State Militia or State Guard (and I’m not speaking here of the National Guard - that organization is subject to federalization. It is actually part of the U.S. Army). And if you’re so inclined, join up.

We can also use our counties as bulwarks against the criminal class. The County Sheriff is the principal peace officer in his jurisdiction. As such, he can lawfully tell the Feds to “Go to Hell” and stay out of his territory. He also can deputize as many of the county’s citizens as he wishes and have them armed to the teeth. No one can over-rule him within his boundaries. Make sure your current Sheriff knows his authority and to whom he answers (you and your neighbors). If he is unwilling to use his authority for the good of the people of his jurisdiction, replace him at the first opportunity.

I discourage the formation of private militias except as a last resort. If your State and local officials refuse to serve the citizens and to protect them by the historic means of Nullification, Interposition, or Secession, then you may have reached the “last resort.” In that case, you have no other alternative except to bow to the will of your masters. Every free man and woman should exercise their rights as expressed in the Second Amendment. Moreover, they should be prepared to defend themselves and their families from actions that jeopardize life, liberty, and property. When political alternatives are no longer available, this is how it boils down. Let’s hope we never reach this point.

All We Wish Is To Be Left Alone

We common Southerners (and most other Americans) prefer to be free to work, worship, and raise our children under the arrangement bequeathed us by our Founders. We do not wish to take that which is not ours or to deprive others of what is rightfully theirs. Nor do we wish to tell others how they ought to live. We are not driven by utopian ideologies or perverse fantasies. We do not wish to conquer the world and ride it, booted and spurred, to satisfy a lust for power and position. As Jefferson Davis said, all we wish is to be left alone. But we are not being left alone; on the contrary, we are being robbed blind by the biggest, most blatant and shameless heist in the history of the world. And not only is our wealth being taken, but our liberties as well. We are also being overrun by an alien population as a result of unlimited and illegal immigration from Latin America.

So, you tell me who are the domestic terrorists? Those who wish to live in peace according to the original American arrangement or those who seek its overthrow for their own greed and ambition?

That the criminal class that now runs America has tried to make us out to be the domestic terrorists ought to tell you something. They are projecting onto us the very characteristics they themselves possess. This dishonest process is called The Law of Preemptory Accusation - they hit you before you can hit them. If they’re thieves, they accuse you of theft; if they’re liars, they accuse you of lying. If they’re haters, they accuse you of hatred. You get the picture.

It is not too late for the domestic terrorists that control this regime (both Democrats and Republicans, Washington and Wall Street) to back off and behave as they should. In truth, I believe they should apologize for all their crimes, return all they have stolen (with penalties and interest attached), pledge henceforth to obey the true and fundamental law of the land, and lock themselves up for a long stint in prison. In short, I believe they ought to be our servants and us their masters. I also believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy.

J. Michael Hill
Killen, Alabama

For more information, call the League at (800) 888-3163 or contact us via email.

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Should Michelle Obama be off limits to criticism?

The Washington Post has come out and blasted those who make fun of her size as being racist. Such attacks are bad journalism. The reality boils down to the old common sense saying “Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones”. Since she is in a public position, she will be in the public eye. Her visibility increases when she wants to meddle in the personal lives and habits of Americans.

When a person attacks the personal eating habits and behavior of people, they will react by making personal attacks back. Common sense dictates that in order to avoid personal attacks, you do not make personal attacks. When a public figure makes such personal attacks, they will be viewed as ‘fair game’. This makes sense in terms of rhetoric and common sense. One uses like attacks to counter attacks that the provocateur made. Michelle Obama and her supporters want the freedom to attack the personal lifestyles of people and then be immune from personal counter-attacks. This is not only illogical, it is another case of arrogance on the part of the regime. The saying “Do as I say and not as I do” is in play here. The double standard of the regime wanting the freedom to criticize without the same standards being applied to them is what is going on.

As a Southron, what this means is that our opponents do not play fair. They never have, they never will. Do not expect them to have manners, or follow protocol. They only use manners and protocol when it benefits them. They do not understand Southron manners and never will.

If they did understand manners, they would not be criticizing how we eat, the light bulbs we use or how we live our lives. Good manners say that you do not make personal attacks. When you do, you recognize that you are not immune to being the target of such criticisms yourself.

The rules the regime plays by are that they are members of an elite group that can criticize, but are immune from any based solely on the intentions of their comments, and their status. They are behaving like royalty which often considered themselves above criticism.

Liberty for Texas!

J Murrah

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Ann Richards in the Spotlight

There is something about the Yankee actress, Holland Taylor playing Ann Richards that I find bizarre and laughable at the same time. What makes it worse is that there are some reporters who interview her for political opinions on contemporary politics. What makes a Yankee actress any kind of expert on Texas politics?

Yes, Ann Richards was an icon in Texas. She also gave us the horrid Robin Hood funding, took Texas into a moral cesspool with her approval of the lottery and campaigned vigorously for the approval of NAFTA. Although her supporters claim she did much for Texas, she stole from rich school districts and their tax payer supporters in an effort to ’spread the wealth’. She lied to us about what the lottery was really being used for. With her NAFTA support, she sold a lot of Texas sovereignty down the river. Bear in mind that George H.W. Bush and her worked closely together on the NAFTA deal. It was a matter of both the left and the right working against conservative values on that one. (Remember George Wallace’s quote about how there is not a dime’s worth of difference between them?).

Now Holland Taylor is in a one-woman show in the Imperial City (Mordor on the Potomac if you wish) peddling this play. Ann Richards was definitely entertaining, yet her policy was not in the best interest of Texas, private property rights, State Sovereignty or numerous other issues. I am reminded of the verse in Proverbs about how a foolish woman destroys her own house one brick at a time. Ann destroyed a great deal of Texas law with her policies. It says a lot about the Imperial City when such iconoclasts as Ann Richards are their role models. It also says a lot about the plastic unrealness, when a Yankee is portraying what is supposed to be a Texas icon.

Instead of plastic imitations of political hacks, we need truth. We need a presentation of facts, and the shambles she made of Texas schools, Texas liberties and Texas rights.

Liberty for Texas!

J Murrah

P.S. Since I wrote this post several school districts in Texas have filed lawsuits to undo Ann Richard’s infamous ‘Robin Hood’ plan.

Technorati , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Obama speaks the truth-for once!

While on a speaking tour of the midwest, President Obama visited Kansas. He opened his speech by telling the audience “It’s great to be back in the State of Texas!” (http://bcove.me/7f92sme5) . Remember that portions of Kansas once belonged to Texas. It was only when the Congress violated the Constitution and created new States out of portions of Texas that once contained portions of Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Wyoming and Colorado. Although he has not likely studied Texas history, this gaff is ‘inspired’. In the same speech he also claimed that now is the “Make or break” moment for the middle class. This is also ironic, since his regime has done it’s darndest to break the middle class and incite further class warfare in the empire.

In his typical style of audacity, he even went so far as to blame the internet for recent job losses. (”Layoffs too often became permanent, not part of the business cycle. And these changes didn’t just affect blue collar workers. If you were a bank teller or a phone operator or a travel agent, you saw many in your profession replaced by ATMs and the internet,“) This is the same President that wants more internet as per his jobs speech on September 8 of this year (”The American Jobs Act will repair and modernize at least 35,000 schools. It will put people to work right now fixing roofs and windows, installing science labs and high-speed Internet in classrooms all across this country”.) So is he wanting to kill more jobs? Does he view the internet as good or bad? Or is this another one of his hypnotic statements which he often includes to ‘zone out’ his audience? Who knows for sure. I know that hot water and cold water do not come out of the same tap.

There is an old saying that a broken clock is right twice a day. I guess a broken President is right a few times as well.

Liberty for Texas! (and while we are at it, let’s claim our land back, since the whole land deal was filled with deceptive underhanded dealing).

J Murrah

Technorati , ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

League of the South and OWS

Technorati ,

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!



http://rpc.technorati.com/rpc/ping